Merge conflicts ruin my commit message while squashing commits
My usual workflow with git is to create a new feature branch, do some work with frequent commits, and then merge back into the development branch when the feature is working and/or stable.
Usually, when I do
git merge --squash feature-branch, I get a nice "squashed commit of the following" message that auto-populates with all of the commit messages from the feature branch.
However, if there are any merge conflicts (say I finished and merged another feature while working on this one), I seem to lose all of my commit messages from the branch. The auto-populated commit message fills in the conflicts, but not the commit messages. Where did my commit messages go? Can I get them back?
I am working on a project in a subversion repository with a strict check-in policy which includes: Every commit to the trunk has to be reviewed by another developer and this must be mentioned in the c
In my company we have recently moved git. While in the process of working in this environment, I end up making a bunch of local commits (in my local branch). In order to keep my code updated I make pu
I would like to check commit message before git commit. I use pre-commit hook to do that, but couldn't find the way to get commit message in .git/pre-commit script. How could I get it?
Let's assume you are merging one branch in Git to another one(no fast forward of course). And you don't have conflicts, so the merge should be successful, without interruptions. But by some reasons yo
Is there any way of preventing files with merge conflict from getting committed in git. No one is going to commit files with conflict intentionally, but is there a way to prevent files from getting co
How can I merge a state before wrong commits into the current head in Git? Mistakenly merge by a other person resetted my change on the server, after I fetched and merged the remote master branch, my
the history will be like this: A<───┬─ BadMerg <── C <── D B<───┘ Now I realized the conflict resolution in the merge was bad. I want to redo the merge again, but to keep the commit C and
How do I edit or reword a merge commit's message? git commit --amend works if it's the last commit made (HEAD), but what if it comes before HEAD? git rebase -i HEAD~5 doesn't list the merge commits.
I have 3 files that are always producing merge conflicts when I am trying to merge between the baseline and my development branch in either direction. When the merge tool opens, there are no conflicts
Within a pre-commit script, is it possible (and if so, how) to identify commits stemming from an svn merge? svnlook changed ... shows files that have changed, but does not differentiate between merges
I am writing a script that requires checking whether a particular commit is a Merge/Revert commit or not, and I am wondering if there is a git trick for that. What I came up with so far (and I definit
Without creating a branch and doing a bunch of funky work on a branch... Is it possible to break a single commit into a few different commits after it's been committed to the local repository?
With SVN it is easy to reverse-merge a commit, but how to do that with Git?
Imagine the following commits: commit 1 commit 2 commit 3 In which I have the files a,b and c. I add the file d, and in the next 3 commits I modify it ( I'm testing some JS on heroku ). I now have th
My local repo was looking like that before I had to pull: [my commit 3] <- to be pushed [my commit 2] <- already pushed [my commit 1] So I pulled and had to do a merge because there were confli
I'm fairly new to Git, and have been working with it for only 3 months. We previously migrated our repositories from SVN. I'd like to be able to merge changes from the master into my dev branch withou
This question already has an answer here: Combine the first two commits of a Git repository? 7 answers Edit the root commit in Git? 5 answers I want to merge two commits into one. I have se
How can I squash my last X commits together into one commit using Git?
Well, I made a mistake and merged another branch into my working branch, but instead to commit this merge I added other changes (well I had to edit a few merge conflicts, but there are now other chang
This question is very related to git rebase interactive: squash merge commits together. Suppose you are writing a new feature for a certain project. You start from a certain branch, say devel, and you
I wanted to have a simple solution to squash two merge commits together during an interactive rebase. My repository looks like: X --- Y --------- M1 -------- M2 (my-feature) / / / / / / a --- b --- c
We started using Mercurial a several weeks ago. Most developers follow this workflow: work on a feature commit -m Worked on feature ABC pull -u If branch merge commit -m Merge push Today, one
I wonder if it is possible in TortoisHG, like in TortoiseSVN, to check if a commit message includes an issue id? In TortoiseSVN you could set the bugtraq properties on the repo to make a dialog box po
I have been using Git Commit Tool to commit my local changes to Git repository. But when i browse to the Commits page of my Github repository, i see that my name is not linkable, as shown in the bel
I have a project in Git. What I want is a list of only the commit messages and the hashes between two commits and store it in a text file. Is there any command that does this ? Thanks.
I tried to commit the changes. After a lot of problems and conflicts, I managed to resolved every problem. However, the code I committed is not currently on any branch (as the git status shows). How c
i want to have no other branch history commit when i merge other branch to master. how can i do it ? as we know: git pull --rebase origin test # mean: only history commit no merge commit. git pull --n
In Git when I have commits eg. A - B - C and I want to edit the B commit, I use git rebase -i <A-commit-hash>, in the list I write edit command in front of B commit, git rebase stops right afte
I have a git repository, I can see all the commits in a particular branch using git log branch-name. But I want to print the commit message, author and date of all commits with respect to a particular
I am working on a hook script to get the commit message of the file that is currently being committed and to change the commit message and then commit, if it does not satisfy a pattern. My question is
git version 126.96.36.199 Hello, I have just merged my local with the repository and now my files have many conflicts. Normally, when I merge I always do it like this: git merge origin/dev --no-commit --no
I wrote a script which can auto commit in every 10 minutes. But it's commit message always same (Code saved). But i want to change some of them which are milestone. This is my auto commit script: cd
I was advised to commit all my changes before running git pull and merge. Does it make sense ? What if I run pull and merge before committing my changes and commit them after the merge?
I am having a problem with Intellij 13 when merging conflicts. When I apply my last merge change, Intellij tries to show me the Save and finish dialog, but apparently the merge window remains above
My question is similar to this one: git svn.. Can I ignore some svn commits while fetching into git I'm using git-svn with a standard svn repo: trunk branches tags Then a co-worker accidentally branc
This is not a duplicate of git pull from clean directory has merge conflicts - In that question the user was trying to pull from a remote which had commits which were not in the local branch. In my ca
How does git determine that a particular merge has a conflict and what the conflict is? My guess would go something like this: if the two commits being merged have a common parent commit, and if they
My ideal workflow would consist of the following steps edit the code compile git commit -a -m commit message start running the new binaries, tests, etc. (may take 10+ minutes) start new changes, wh
I am using git-svn and I know that svn does not support changing commits if I haven't yet run git svn dcommit can i still change the last commit message, i left something out of it. If so, how do you
I need a plumbing command to print the commit message of one given commit - nothing more, nothing less.
I'm coming from SVN to Git. In SVN when two developers change the same file at same time (from the same file version), the last committer will get a conflict flag to solve before commit his changes. I
I have created a new commit, but forgot to pull before that using git stashand than git pull. Now if I will do the git pull . I'll get one more commit as merge origin/branch to my branch (already some
I need to merge a feature branch into my master branch on SourceTree. Every time I merge the feature branch, I see in the master branch commit history all the feature branch commits history. I want to
My routine on git has always been very simple: git add -A git commit -m 'the changes I made' git pull # resolve conflicts git push However, for some unknown reasons, despite lots of conflicts with th
I happily use vim as my default editor for commits, and do not wish to change it. However, when it comes to rebasing, I find myself squashing dozens and dozens of commits which I find much easier with
Ive been using sourcegear vault and subversion/visual svn for quite a while now and am a big fan of the CVS disconnected style Edit -> Merge -> Commit way of using source control. Since we mov
I'm pretty new to this Git thing. I tried to commit my work, using commit amend inside GitX (cause I wanted to make only 1 final commit). I pulled the latest source, resolved conflicts, then staged an
I'm new to GIT and I think my merge wiped out some other people's work. Ouch. I heard that its best to avoid the GIT merge workflow, and to rebase commits (locally) so you put your commits as clean co
When I squash commits in a branch (using git rebase -i), I'm always annoyed that the squashed commit is combined with the older commit instead of the newer commit. I don't understand why it was design
Unfortunately we accidently checked in a large binary file some time ago and until today nobody noticed. Now I want to drop that commit and have the remaining history as it is. I know about the caveat