git: merge branch and use meaningful merge commit message?
After I merge a feature branch back to main branch I usually need to do a merge commit by default. But I'd like to use the original commit messages from my feature branch in this commit instead of "merge branch XXX".
How should I do that?
I have two branches, private and public. I work on the private and periodically, I want to replace everything in public branch to have a clean copy of files in private. As I don't want the his
What are the best practices of merging hotfix branch into master/develop? Do I need to merge it into both branches hotfix → master hotfix → develop or merge to master and then to develop after. hotf
I have two branches(Master and Dev). I did some things on the Dev branch, and attempted to merge them with the master branch. git commit -am Dev changes git push git checkout master git merge Dev
I'm trying to understand why git will produce a commit with a unique SHA1 for a merge between two branches with no conflicts. Is storing the information that there were no conflicts really worth the e
I just did: git reset --merge and I lost my latest modifications to some files, how do I undo this last action?
I made three commits on Branch A git checkout Branch B git merge --squash A git commit -m B:merge A into B by squash How can I detect branch A has been merged into B by squash?
Is develop branch in git flow branching model shared by different people? So we have to manually push develop and pull it to merge? Or each person have his develop branch and people need to get
In Git, is there a way to merge all changes from one branch into another, but squash to a single commit at the same time? I often work on a new feature in a separate branch and will regularly commit/
I have 2 branches local and remote like below. # dev master Right now I have merged changes local using git checkout master & git merge dev. It works great. Using git status I got below: Your bra
I merged a relatively old branch into master and the outcome of the merge was an unholy mess. For some unknown reason when I ran git merge it automatically took some of the out of date code that had s
Suppose I have two branches A and B that I want to merge in git and those two branches will generate a merge conflict. I would like to tell git something along the lines of Merge B into A and if there
I ran a git pull that ended in conflict. I resolved the conflict files and everything is fine now (I use mergetool also). When I commit the resolved file with git commit file.php -m message I get th
I have the following branches in my Git repository: master release-1.0 bugfix-abc I have merged the bugfix-abc branch into master but should have merged it into the release-1.0 branch. This is fine
I created a new branch from old master-commit. When trying to merge it with master using git checkout master git merge newbranch I am getting Already up to date although it is a different code. O
two branch in git, i use gitolite for Access control. branch 'dev' and branch 'main'. developers must commit to 'dev', and merge to 'main', then push 'dev' and 'main'. my problem is that how to only a
I am using forked repository of MainRepo.in my forked repository I have a branch name as Demo2.In this branch I have 2 files names are file1and file2. Know I want to merge total files from Demo2 to me
One developer merged branch feature2 into feature1 and pushed the results, but resolved some merge conflicts incorrectly. I checked out commit A from feature1 and correctly merged in commit B from fea
I am running into a strange issue that is causing work to be lost. A coworker made a commit a few days ago into a remote branch. Sometime yesterday that remote branch was merged into master. All the c
Is there any way of simulating a git merge between two branches (current working branch and the master), but without making any changes? I often have conflicts when I have to make a git merge. Is ther
When I am not on the master branch, git sometimes complains You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want to merge with, and 'branch.basics.merge' in your configuration file does not
I switch to a branch (branch1) in git and I did multiple commits there in that branch. And now I switch to another branch (branch2), how can I merge 1 (the latest in branch1) to this new branch (branc
Here is our current feature branch work flow -> From the master create a new feature branch. Commit work to the feature branch. Merge the master into the feature branch as we work to keep it up
I've been working with another person on a repo we host at github. Everytime I or he pulls, git forces us to make a merge commit (vim opens up with a commit description), although we were working on d
I have a branch A started from trunk and a branch B started from A. Periodically, a merge from trunk to A is made and later a merge from A to B is also performed. When I want to merge A and B to trunk
As above, is it possible to export an SVN repo with history into a new Git repo and then use Git to do a merge from a branch back into the trunk?
I am a newbie to git. I was working on a branch that involved lot of moving around of the code, including deletion of old and addition of new files. Therefore I decided to do a dry-run of git merge be
Threre are multiple resources that will tell you how to revert a branch merge in git in case you figured out a bug in the branch. The steps following such a merge will either be reset/correct errors i
I'm trying to merge changes made in the master branch of my repository into a development branch using git or TortoiseGit. I know that I can just use either a git pull or a merge, but this merges in t
git log reveals the following: commit 1abcd[...] Author: [...] Date: [...] [Useful commit] commit 2abcd[...] Author: [...] Date: [...] Merge branch [...] of [etc. etc.] commit 3abcd[...] Author: [...]
When merging a branch into another, it is possible to define the merge strategy like git merge release -X ours This applies the strategy ours globally when merging stuff from the release branch int
This is not a duplicate of git pull from clean directory has merge conflicts - In that question the user was trying to pull from a remote which had commits which were not in the local branch. In my ca
I just did git pull origin branch accidentally and now I have all these changes merged into master I tried reverting the commit w/ github for mac and got this error: fatal: Commit d0fbfb0f7d3ea8.. is
Suppose my Git repository initially has two branches: Foo and Bar. ... ─ Foo ... ─ Bar I create a third branch, FooBar in which I commit the merge of the two other branches. ... ─ Foo ──┐ FooBar .
I've done merge some-branch into master, but gets confilcts. How to undo this ? git checkout master git merge some-branch ... CONFLICTS :(
I'm pretty sure this situation is quite common, but I haven't found any information on how to deal with it in git. Here's what's happened so far: Imagine the following folder structure in a git repo:
develop branch --> dashboard (working branch) I use git merge --no-ff develop to merge any upstream changes into dashboard git log: commit 88113a64a21bf8a51409ee2a1321442fd08db705 Merge: 981bc20 88
I have a master and a test branch both locally and synced with my Github account. I've merged the test branch into master since I'm done with it: git checkout master git merge test Now I want to push
I want to use a git hook to force commit messages to comply with a specific format (they should end with #number). I've tried installing this hook, also referenced here, but I keep getting the message
This question already has an answer here: How to replace master branch in git, entirely, from another branch? [duplicate] 5 answers I sometimes find I'm working on a branch and I want to merge
There're few question about flattening merge on StackOverflow, with an answer usually being git rebase. These answers though miss one crucial point - order of commits. Suppose there's a branch A w
Assuming we have one trunk and one branch (COKE). (I run Git over SVN and merge from trunk to COKE with svn, not Git) There have been changes in FILE1 on trunk that we want in COKE branch. We merge f
Assuming you have this: master: o--o--o development: `o--o--o I want to merge the changes back as one commit (avoiding all the junk commits along the way): git checkout master git merge --squash dev
This is a newbie question. I have 2 branches, branch_A and branch_B. I am in branch A and do a merge with this command: git checkout branch_A git merge --commit -m my commit branch_B If there is no
I tried to merge two heads in Mercurial. After merging, I didn't commit and did some more changes. Then I tried to commit and got the following message: abort: cannot partially commit a merge (do not
When I and my colleague work on the same git branch, each of us sees a strange commit with message Merge branch 'X' of URL into X where X - the same branch. after pull has been performed (and new ch
everybody. now,I have some commit on my branches.I want to merge the branches to trunk,but there have some commit that I don't merge to trunk on my branches.How do I do? please help me ,thanks!
I done several commits in master branch and next merge them to dev branch. I want to create branch from specific commit in dev branch which is first committed in master branch. I use commands git chec
Usually, I work with branches in Git, but I don't like to see hundreds of branches in my working tree (Git history). I'm wondering if there is a method in Git to join all commits in a branch in only
My Git history looks like that : I would like to squash the purple commits into a single one. I don't want to see them ever again in my commit log. I've tried to do a git rebase -i 1, but even though
Is it possible to merge other branch into another branch? For example, I'm in branch1 and want to pull remote/develop into develop branch and then merge develop into current branch1. What am I doing i