Accidentally did a branch origin set up to track local branch
I accidentally did:
git checkout mybranch
git branch --set-upstream origin mybranch
Branch origin set up to track local branch mybranch.
How do I reset that and what could it do to me?
I have configured one repository in GitHub MyRepository` In this repository, i have one branch master and in this branch i have one project Test In eclipse i created one local repository, the st
I have two branches: local branch (the one which I work with) remote branch (public, only well-tested commits go there) Recently I seriously messed up my local branch (guess every git-newbie has bee
I'm new to git. I thought the idea behind using feature branches was that all changes would not show up in the master branch. I just created a feature branch called 'line_items', though the changes on
I have already got a local master branch tracking the remote master branch of a github project. Now, a collaborator of mine has created a new branch in the same project, and I want to do the following
I am forking from github.com/mantisbt/mantisbt which results in github.com/MYACCOUNT/mantisbt from where I clone it and checkout the branch (I am interested in) to my local machine. My issue is th
I have been making some changes to my working directory, and noticed that I have accidentally been working on the wrong branch. I have not committed anything yet, and I would like my next commit to go
I have a feature/admin branch that is tracking multiple branches (origin/feature/admin and development, the latter being local) - I want to remove the local tracking (so my local branch only tracks
I was trying to track a remote branch and ended up doing the following: $ git branch --track origin/branch1 Branch origin/branch1 set up to track local branch branch1. Which is obviously not what I i
I did this: git branch --track stats_page to create a separate branch to try something out. But now everytime I push or pull I see: $ git pull From . * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD and $ git push
I tried looking for a an answer to this, but couldn't find any which address this specific need. Which is weird. I want to be able to do the following: create a local branch based on some other (remo
Is there shortcut that will allow to push to selected branch? It can be a command, or something similar: git push branch that will run this code: git push origin $(git branch | grep '*' | sed -e 's/*
I am a newbie of git, I try to understand what is origin and origin/master in git, what does the origin means? where it is? and someone says it is remote branch, what is the remote branch?
I want to fetch a branch from a remote, but my branch name does not start with remote name, for example: git checkout -b BRANCH origin/BRANCH It work in some cases, but in some cases I get this error
I have a local branch (CRM-ayrshireminis) that has a couple of commits on it that I have pushed to the origin (origin/CRM-ayrshireminis). This branch was created from the develop branch about one week
I don't understand the second line in the output to git branch -l -a: remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master. git branch -l -a * master remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/master
I used git filter-branch and screwed something up and accidentally rewrote sections of the history I didn't want to. I was trying to change one name and accidentally changed every single commit (inste
I have a branch called develop in my local repo, and I want to make sure that when I push it to origin it's merged with the origin/master. Currently, when I push it's added to a remote develop branch.
I have two branches, master and mybranch in a git repository. In a local folder cloned from the git repository before adding the second branch, I can only see the first branch, as expected: xxx$ git b
I think it is a very basic question. I am working on svn repo and do not want to create a new svn branch. Instead of that I want to create a branch local to my machine. Something which could be done e
I have this message on git status: # On branch YYY # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/XXX' by 10 commits. # nothing to commit (working directory clean) Branch YYY is child of branch XXX. But normally
I have a local develop branch dev and a remote master branch. For the dev branch, I have a quite complicated commit history(nearly 20 successive commits). I tried to use git rebase -i origin/m
I had a git repository with a remote branch origin/master. I needed the repository to track a branch on another remote git server m1/master. So I added the new remote server using the git remote add c
I'm trying to reduce access times to ClearCase a bit, and am thinking about removing all the unused branch types (i.e. ones where no element has a branch of that type in the VOB). Is there a simple qu
I'm having trouble comparing local master (which is on same commit as origin/master) with production/master. $ git remote -v origin firstname.lastname@example.org:mydomain/mydomain.git (fetch) origin email@example.com:m
I've done something incredibily stupid. I figured I should ask before I tried to fix it and accidentally make things worse. I tried to list all remote branches in my git repo: git branch remote Obv
This question already has an answer here: Default behavior of “git push” without a branch specified 11 answers Is there a way to configure git to default push my current branch to the origin? E
Currently learning git and command lines. Sometimes ot can be confusing. eg: master *beta-feature on local, working on beta-feature branch, there is new changes committed by someone else on the same
well, i have just made a huge mistake. I am working on a project, and thought i was working in the master branch. So i added the files i needed, commited them and when i tried to push to origin i got
For instance: I have a local repo branch 'master', and a remote repo branch 'r-master' with a directory 'dir1', I'd like to push 'master' to 'r-master/dir1' and making 'master' to keep track of 'r-mas
When creating a branch with name that matches that of a remote branch the configurations for push and pull are set differently. Having the current remote branches: $ git branch -r origin/HEAD -> or
I have been working on a local topic branch for some time, making only a few changes every now and then. In the mean time, the master branch has evolved significantly. I decided to incorporate the new
I would like to fetch all branches from the remote and then rebase my current branch on any changes to the master branch. To do this, for some reason, I need to first checkout master, pull, and then
I'm not sure how this happened, but recently I noticed a strange remote branch that shows up when i run the command git branch -a remotes/origin/pr/121 remotes/origin/pr/122 remotes/origin/pr/126 how
Can someone explain why this isn't working? ➜ workspace git:(REL-BRANCH-1.0.1d) ✗ git branch -a REL-BRANCH-1.0.1c * REL-BRANCH-1.0.1d remotes/origin/REL-BRANCH-1.0.1c remotes/origin/master ➜ workspace
is there any shortcuts for current git branch? i would like to do something like this: $ git fetch origin $ git rebase -i origin/a_very_very_very_long_branch_name where, my local branch name is as sa
I did a bunch of work on a local master that I decided needed a new branch. I created a branch diffraction on a machine at work and pushed it: $ git checkout -b diffraction $ git push Then I went to
When I run git branch -a I get this: master origin remote upstream web_search remotes/origin/HEAD -> origin/master remotes/origin/ba remotes/origin/insur remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/mv re
My coworker accidentally made two commits in the default branch instead of creating new his own development branch. How can I change this situation and moves these two commits to a new branch?
I was working on a local branch lets call it dev, other team-members pushed new content to remote's master. So I commited the branch, checked-out local master and pulled from the remote one, then I
The result I would need is that when cloning a repository the code is at the last revision of a branch that is not the default branch, with no need to do hg update mybranchname. Is this possible?
This is probably a dumb question, but I'm brand new to git and am seeing a remote branch that no longer exists. $ git branch -a * master remotes/origin/master remotes/origin/production I don't believ
I have locally commited severela times to a certain branch (called master-branch). Now i figure out that would better go to a different branch (feature-branch). I have not pushed the commits. Can i op
I've cloned some git repository, and did git branch abcd, whcih switched me to a branch derived from origin/abcd. abcd is not the default origin branch. Then, I have created a feature branch my_fea
I cloned a Git repository and when I do a 'git checkout' I see branch-0.2 and origin/branch-0.2 in the list of the branches. What is the difference between the two branches? I read a couple of article
I have two build definitions for my project which has two branches. Development and Live. I have set up manual build for development branch and this is running just fine. Now I wanted to set up gated
I have a strange situation I haven't encountered before. I've just done git fetch gotten updates for both my develop and master branches: From remote-host:my_repo f3946b5..c3b2d44 develop -> origin
Is there any git command (or a short sequence of commands) that will safely and surely do the following: get rid of any local changes, fetch the given branch from origin if necessary, checkout the gi
I have created a local branch X that at some point I pushed to remote server (origin) git push origin X I realized it's a bad idea to have branch named X and want it to be called Y The problem is tha
As you can understand I'm still learning Git and how branch works. Anyways: I was working on a local master branch. I created and switched to a new fcwdetection branch for adding some code, using my
What the title says. Version of git is 18.104.22.168 I've tried using git branch --track But it throws errors saying that the branches already exist. I am confused. Thanks in advance!