About Git's merge and rebase
The above is the result of merge and rebase.
My question is that in the final state ,are C5 and C3' identical?
git rebase is equal to
git merge + remove C3?
Yes, another git flow question.. :( I know the 'standard' git rebase flow pretty well: Developer creates a tracking branch (say 'featureA') off of an upstream branch (say 'master') Developer codes, c
My colleague and I are having an vigorous discussion about merge strategies and I'm hoping we can get some information to help resolve it. The tl:dr is: Should we use merge or rebase when pulling chan
git rebase leaves the conflict markers inline in files; something like: <<<<<<< HEAD Whatever line + context is different from the previous commit ======= Whatever line + context
It happens that information about a merge are lost after we do a stash. A usual merge and a stashed merge are compared below. Right: merge + push git merge release-2013-10-29 # Everything works, cool
I don't quite understand how the commits are squashed with git rebase -i. There is one thing I was left wondering: If my rebase -i produces this list: pick A Last commit pick B Commit pick C Some othe
Here is my situation: A master \ \-- B --- C --- D topic I want to merge topic branch to master but only to commit C without changes introduced in commit D. I know I can create new branch from topic
I've accidentally pulled some changes from the main repo with --rebase parameter. How do I restore the original repository state from the backup which was created during the rebase?
I've been digging through the git merge and rebase docs, and something isn't sinking in. I'm actively working on a project in Git, and need to share specific milestones with other developers. I want t
Sometimes when I do a pull instead of a rebase after a simple one file change commit I see the following in the master log: Trivial merge But there's no diff of what changed? What's the point of thi
I think the only rule about rebase and push is that After commits are pushed to a public repo, don't rebase and push But is it true that if we only use git push or git push origin <branch-name>
I have done everything i know about MERGE in this fiddle but am not getting output.Hope someone will come up with a solution for this. I have done a simple MERGE statement to insert, update and delet
We were trying to rebase our stream. After click on complete we got issue like some thing is corrupted. [Sorry my collegue did not take the screenshot of error] we tried to redo the rebase operation.
I am now in the middle of branch rebase (conflicts stage) and I want to skip some commits using git rebase --skip. However I am wondering how to check what commit is actually being applied to the work
I am using git archive with --remote option to archive multiple gits ,are located under one folder. I want to include those folder names of four gits and if .gitattributes is available in those gits t
I added these lines to hgrc in my .hg folder: [extension] rebase = but hg rebase still returns an error: Unknow command 'rebase'. It may be a dumb question but do I need to include the path to rebase
I've been fighting the git/git-svn learning curve and last night, as part of that learning curve, I did something very, very bad. I've since gotten it corrected, but I'm hoping to understand the error
We deploy some scripts directory from github. I have an automated process that generates one of the scripts every hour. I need to upload that to github fork, essentially pull, merge -s ours, commit, t
I am trying to merge my local with the changes I pulled and I get this error: % hg merge --verbose --tool=internal:fail 68 resolving manifests '.hgsubstate' [command returned code 255 Wed Apr 10 09:10
It was my first try to understanding how git rebase is working. I was on new branch did a lot of changes and then I'd try git rebase, and in result I got next output: $ git rebase master First, rewind
So I have a branch of master, let's call it foo, that I've been using for a while, and after about 50 commits or so I was getting a rather complicated merge history, as foo had some subbranches of its
I always use git rebase to sync my code, I found that git stash saves the current work and after fetching the latest code from master we can merge it with our code by using git stash pop. Suppose the
I ran a git rebase origin/[branch] on a branch that is the result of merging multiple local branches together during development. As expected I ran into some conflicts and began fixing them. The first
We are currently using SVN, but considering moving to Git to support our new workflow, which relies heavily on rebase. We're considering a development workflow where each individual feature is develop
I am performing a git pull from my master branch to one local machine with my application and it is giving me a merge conflict error in my Gemfile lock. How can i go about this?
There is lots of good advice to ponder about cherry-picking (using this term in the abstract here: not the actual command, per se) in SO already, but all that I have read so far seems to assume that t
every time i git rebase my patchset on a new version of the original, do i have to manually resolve the conflicts again and again?
When I am not on the master branch, git sometimes complains You asked me to pull without telling me which branch you want to merge with, and 'branch.basics.merge' in your configuration file does not
1) why wasn't i given an opportunity to stage pieces of my commits so i can tease them into distinct commits before merging with team? 2) why doesn't the hash before the rebase equal to the hash after
Is it possible to rebase topic branch with some changes pending review on upstream? I want to preserve all review comments, etc. but also have latest changes made in upstream. I thought about followin
I am having an issue with rebasing from master on to a 'deploy' branch within one of my repositories. My repo is setup as follows: master - of course, the main branch deploy - a branch created where f
When building a project with Visual Studio, I noticed a nasty little post linker error, with windows Rebase REBASE: *** RelocateImage failed (dll name) Image may be currupted I was unable to get a us
I see a lot of questions where people are asking how that can avoid pointless merge commits. What exactly is bad about a merge commit? I find them useful, as you can see exactly where two developers
I was on my own local feature branch and wanted to merge it into master. I checked out master, did git pull --rebase, had one conflict, resolved it, but I forgot to do git rebase --continue after that
What exactly happens when I run the command git pull --rebase on master branch Does this rewrite my master branch history Is it a good way to pull changes or should we 1. Git fetch 2. Git merge
i want to have no other branch history commit when i merge other branch to master. how can i do it ? as we know: git pull --rebase origin test # mean: only history commit no merge commit. git pull --n
This question already has an answer here: When do you use git rebase instead of git merge? 8 answers I'm a solo developer and am just getting into using Git with private BitBucket repositories.
I am still trying to decide on the Git workflow for our project. It's very confusing and somewhat hard to grasp. I am probably missing something obvious or doing it completely wrong. Here goes one of
I need to list all of the activities delivered in a baseline but need any deliver and rebase activities expanded. I have tried a script to read the lines and do an lsact -contrib but some of the del
I needed to merge sorted lists into one list (number of lists may vary). As I new to Erlang - I didn't know about pretty function lists:merge/1. So I implemented own merge/1 function. It's complexity
I pushed some changes to our central git repository, and then immediately realized that I had an old, now obsolete change lying around, and that I had introduced a merge with it: I then used git reba
Currently when I'm working on my local feature branch in order to get latest changes I need to do the following: git checkout master git fetch git rebase git checkout my-feature git rebase master Is
I'm using git, and made a small commit followed by a large one. I decided to use git rebase to squash the two commits together before pushing them. (I've never done this before.) So I did: git rebase
I was doing a git rebase. There were many merge conflicts during the rebase, and i had to resolve them manually. After the rebase, i have found out that i have made a mistake in resolving conflicts fo
I use git svn to track a SVN repo. When I try to do a git svn rebase I am getting this error: Incomplete data: Delta source ended unexpectedly This is a large repo, with a long history. Just fetching
This wasn't so bad at the beginning, but now I have hundreds of no-op merge problems (solved by git rebase --skip). I have setup a shared git repo for my group because it is easier to deal with. But t
I'm new to GIT and I think my merge wiped out some other people's work. Ouch. I heard that its best to avoid the GIT merge workflow, and to rebase commits (locally) so you put your commits as clean co
I'm pretty new to git so not sure how to fix the current problem I find myself in. I was told to do a git pull --rebase git push To merge my local commits to the ones on the server. Now however, all
I just ran git pull --rebase and forget to specify origin. It looks like git pulled from all different branches. Is there a way to revert my repo from here to undo the pull? Thanks
I'm having a serious problem trying to do git rebase --interactive on my repo. I get the cryptic error fatal: ref HEAD is not a symbolic ref, and my rebase ceases to function. I must git rebase --abor
Consider following scenario: I checked out a branch from master I made some commits I merged updated master I made some more commits Now I want rebase commits from point 4 so that commits from point