Git pull without history
I created a local copy of a remote repository. Because of some old bad commit data causing trouble, I had to rewrite (filter-branch) the local repo history. So now I have a clone of a remote repo, except the commit hashes are all different.
Is there any way to have the local repo still work with remote for pulling future commits from it? It will never be pushing so that is not an issue. If I run git pull, it tries to pull it's entire original history, which is unwanted and just re-corrupts the local repo.
Say I have a huge git repository and it has a number of swfs and images in there. I want them to be included in the hosted github repository, but they don't need to be versioned, and I don't want to h
In reading the git pull page, it gives this stern warning about git pull --rebase: This is a potentially dangerous mode of operation. It rewrites history, which does not bode well when you published
Look at the diagram: How can I approach this? If I use pull, all the commit histories will be pull down. I don't want the git histories to consume my server's disk space
Is there any way to set up git such that it listens for updates from a remote repo and will pull whenever something changes? The use case is I want to deploy a web app using git (so I get version cont
I just rewrote a simple Rails application. The previous version of my application has a long git commit history that I'd like to retain with this rewrite. I have not even initialized git in the rewrit
Is it possible to have git pull and git push in one git command? The syntax like git pull & git push doesn't suit me completely, since I need to provide my credentials to the server twice: on pull
We moved a project from svn to git recently. Before moving to git, some folders were re-organized in svn. Now, git doesnt show the complete history for files in the folders that were moved/re-named in
i want to have no other branch history commit when i merge other branch to master. how can i do it ? as we know: git pull --rebase origin test # mean: only history commit no merge commit. git pull --n
is it possible with Git's tools to move files into a new folder while modifying its full history, as if the files had been there from their first add? I came up on this after merging some repos togeth
How can I safely update (pull) a git project, keeping specific files untouched, even if there's upstream changes? myrepo/config/config.php Is there a way, of, even if this file was being changed on re
This question is based on this thread. My .gitmodules is at my Home [submodule bin] path = bin url = git://github.com/masi/bin.git My folder -structure at my Home: ~ |-- [drwxr-xr-x] bin // this is
Git branch heads and tags are pointers to commits, and these pointers can move either implicitly (after a commit) or explicitly (after a branch -m). Does Git record the history of the state of these p
I am looking for a way of detecting up front whether a git pull or git merge would fail. The sort of script I want to perform is to update a server. git fetch git okay stop server backup data git merg
I'd like to do a git pull from a computer which does NOT have ssh installed. This git pull is going to be part of an automated process, essentially a shell script that is run periodically. This means
Where is git pull --force as in rm -rf and then git clone again from scratch? End result should be git diff returns nothing.
I am curious about some best practices. There is a git repo that I would like to include as a submodule in my project. I would also like to contribute to this repo and offer pull requests. I have fork
This question already has an answer here: What are the differences between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? 19 answers git pull keeping local changes 4 answers How can I pull only unchanged file
How should one go about viewing full history of a file's content in git? A file has a very short history in git, repository synced over git-svn, but a long history in svn. The history in git reaches t
When I write a command like git remote add ... Can the owner of the repository see that I added the repo? Furthermore, if I pull it, can the original owner of the repository see that I did this?
My current git history looks like this: develop: A -- B -- C \ feature1: D -- E \ feature2: G -- H -- I But, I would prefer this, instead: feature2: G' -- H' -- I' / develop: A -- B -- C \ feature1:
I can't git push/pull to github from my corporate vpn: git push origin master ssh: connect to host github.com port 22: Connection timed out fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly I assume this is
I searched a lot but was not able to find a confident solution(pardon me as I am new to git and maybe I didn't get some term well). So I will state my exact problem here: I have a software (say in br
Is there a way to generate a certificate or such so that my prod server can pull from my github repo without me authenticating every single time?
I have a repository which was created by copying files (not the history) from an SVN repository, with many changes added on top since. I have since converted the history in SVN into git, and merged it
I am trying to do a pull from my git repository on bitbucket, using Egit (Eclipse). I can do push without any problems, but when I try to pull I get the error message: The current branch is not c
git newbie in here. I had 2 branches a and b in my local repo. so if i do git branch *a b then by mistake i did git pull origin and it pulled a bunch of files and messed my working environment on
Hey all, this is quick one, since I'm quite new to git. I have a repo setup on a server (A) where access is via ssh rsa keys. I have a few users there including myself. Now I do git clone on my local
I'm totally messed with my git repository. I can't push / pull remote branch..it disappeared from git extensions... I use Git Extensions 2.33 , msysgit Git-1.7.11-preview20120710.exe C:\Program Files
I've tried pretty much all of these, none appear to work: Force git to overwrite local files on pull Here's 2 scenarios: A) Delete a local file 1) git clone my_repo 2) cd my_repo 3) delete some file 4
I just cant understand this. I been reading a lot on the web and books and something is just not staying in my head. Can someone please give me the dummy version of the following: git fetch vs pull an
I have a somewhat confusing question in GIT. Lets say, I have a file dir1/A.txt committed and git preserves a history of commits Now I need (for some reasons) to copy the file into dir2/A.txt (not mov
I run this git pull command and it chokes on the Unicode file names & git pull From . * branch master -> FETCH_HEAD First, rewinding head to replay your work on top of it... error: The followin
Currently I'm using git log --graph --all to visualize my repo's history I'd like the output to also contain the branch for which the commit was done on. How would i do this? Current Output: * | comm
I would appreciate it if someone could tell me how I could delete every single file/folder on my GitHub repo without actually deleting the repo itself. I want to delete all history associated with tho
Is there a way to git pull until there is something to pull. Say i'm waiting for a collegue to push his latest changes, since i'm impatient and not looking at his screen, i just run watch git pull unt
I was taught that you could push to and pull from a remote branch matching the name of your current Git branch by doing: git push origin HEAD or git pull origin HEAD Its always worked for me before,
How I can do this in one command on MacOSX? git stash git pull origin master git stash pop I've tried with git stash && git pull origin mater && git stash apply and works fine.
I'm trying to gain a more thorough understanding of git. Can someone give me a simple line-by-line explanation of what basic git pull output means? Example: remote: Counting objects: 11, done. remote
I am having trouble in overiting changes from remote repo with git I am on master and git status show 1 modified file Now i want to use git pull so that all current modification are overwriiten by pu
I keep a Git server on Amazon EC2, and in order to push or pull to it I need to run ssh-add ~/.ssh/pem/Me.pem. Is there any way to add this .pem file to the Git config such that I won't have to run ss
In git to pull and use the latest changes to my local repository I'm using git pull. In hg, I also use hg pull but it prints then run 'hg update' to get a working copy I do run hg update but I wonder
My repository structure is like this: Main folder |-- A | |-- some | +-- files | +-- B |-- some |-- more +-- files But when I pull it only A folder is there.
I am working with a developer that is new to git, and I would like to setup a git workflow that would let me auditing the commits made by this developer (and possibly reject them) without forcing him
I have a colleague who claims that git pull is harmful, and gets upset whenever someone uses it. The git pull command seems to be the canonical way to update your local repository. Does using git pull
Hey I'm new to git and I need to undo a pull, can anyone help?!? So what I've done is... git commit git stash git pull --rebase git stash pop this created a bunch of conflicts and went a bit wrong.
My personal repository has some repositories as submodules. And the following command $ git submodule foreach git pull origin master was faced with the following result right after entering ruby repo
I am using git GUI. How can I implement the git bash command git pull --rebase? I am going to use this command before push.
git is giving me some headache lately. I have cloned a git repository and then checked out a tag: # git checkout 2.4.33 -b my_branch This is OK, but when I try to run git pull in my branch, git spits
I've been looking into rebasing with Git over the past couple days. Most of the arguments for rebasing say that it cleans up the history and makes it more linear. If you do plain merges (for example),
I have two branches: master and opengl. Recently I have finished implementation (or at least I though so) of opengl branch and decided to merge it into master: git checkout master git merge opengl git