Automatically delete git branch after merge to master
We will be attempting a work flow in github where every ticket is a branch off of master.
After the ticket is complete, the work is merged into staging where regression and integration tests are performed before it is merged into master.
A team lead brought up the issue of the old ticket branches after a merge will start to build up.
I found this script and want to know if this would work in our environment. We only want to delete branches that have been merged into master.
I have created a new branch with some changes in it, I would like to still have the new branch but identical to the master branch. Is it possible to override a branch with another one's content? Tha
I have created a testing branch. It has a lot of tiny commits to build one feature. At the end of it, I want to take the final completed changes, and put them into the master branch. The master branch
I'am using git as scm of choice but have to use a svn-repo. I can create a svn-remote-branch like this: git svn branch the_branch But how can i delete the remote branch?
I have a develop branch and a feature branch in my git repo. I added a commit to develop and now I want that commit to be merged to my feature branch. If I do this git checkout feature git merge devel
Currently when I'm using GIT I create a branch for each job and make various commits before I'm finished. I then merge back with my master branch and push upstream. I'm likely to have several branches
I am completely new to Git. I committed some wrong code and then to rectify it, I reset my current branch to the previous one. But somehow this didnt do what i wanted! Now my master has an additional
I just need to delete a master branch and is proving to be hard. I just want to clean that branch out and start new. I am deteting from dev branch. I want master on git hub to be clean. # git push or
I'm looking to rewrite my git repo to use a new branching model I came across: http://nvie.com/git-model But right now all my history lives in the master branch. I'd like to rewrite it (possible using
Let's say I have a private topic branch called develop with 2 commits ahead of master. What does git pull origin master do? Pull everything from the remote master in the local develop and merge it? Pu
I have create a 'dialog' branch and when I try to merge it to 'master' branch. There are 2 conflicts. I don't know how to resolve 'CONFLICT (delete/modify)'. Can you please tell me what to do? $ git c
I am using a bare git repository on a server for backup, and push local changes there with 'git push' after doing 'git commit' locally. 'git status' tells me # On branch master # Your branch is ahead
I can't delete the branch in my remote server. First I tried this one git push origin --delete devTime but it gives me an error like this: fatal: 'origin' does not appear to be a git repository fat
I am creating named Mercurial branches for new features in my application, and after I finish a particular feature, I merge that branch into default branch, and close this feature branch. But I wonder
I have a master branch which I always merge with development. Is it possible to set development as the default merge branch? (To save a few types). Instead of typing: $ (master) git merge development
This is not a duplicate of git pull from clean directory has merge conflicts - In that question the user was trying to pull from a remote which had commits which were not in the local branch. In my ca
In git, supposing I have a branch master and a tag 0.0.1, if I do the following: git checkout 0.0.1 git branch -b random-fix # some changes... git checkout master git merge random-fix The branch from
Supposedly two people are working on a project and one of them, unknowingly from the other, creates a new branch in the project. Now, say the first person keeps on pushing changes to the master branch
I am trying to delete some files in a branch, but I don't want those files deleted from master or from other branches. However, when I delete a file on branchA, the same files are deleted on branchB a
I have a simple question about tagging different versions of my project with git. If I just completed my 1.1 branch and plan to merge it into master, should I tag this branch as 1.1 before I merge it,
How does one merge a local master branch that has diverged from the master on the server with a new branch created from the current master branch on the repo? I have been working on a local copy of a
I use git for a website. So at first I started with master, created develop and worked in it. The website is finished by now. I merged develop into master and tagged it with v1.0. What about the 'deve
I'm kind of a git Noob and somehow I got my master and my origin/master branch to diverge. I actually don't want them to be diverged. How can I view these differences and 'merge' them?
The convention when using git and you want to get changes from the server is: git fetch git merge origin/master I know there is also git pull, but my specific question is about the syntax origin/maste
I am working on a google maps project on android and i need to update the maps to the new v2 version, thus ive created a branch with git add -u git commit -m 'xxxyyyzzz' git checkout -b MapsV2 Then
It's possible that I'm not really understanding how git works here, but I have a master git branch, and then I created a new branch called refresh. I switched to the refresh branch, made a ton o
I have master branch with initial state: touch file git add file git commit -m initial Then I did some changes: echo 123 >> file git commit -am feature1 which really belong to a feature
I ran into problems by merging the master branch with my feature branch. So I tried to understand how git handles merges and what's the best way to update a feature branch with the changes from the ma
I need to lock master branch of a git repo. I tried pre-commit hooks but they are only client side hooks, but I want to lock master branch from most of the users. Can anyone tell me the steps for pre-
Given repo Foo and repo Bar. I want to merge Bar with Foo, but only into a separate branch, called baz. git checkout -b baz <= put the Bar repo here.
I have a tracking branch to which I merged my master branch. There were conflicts that I fixed, committed and pushed. Now I need to revert that merge. How do I do it? I tried checking log, but obvious
I have a Git repository that has branch (local and remote) that has become outdated. I would like to bring this branch up to date with the master branch, but I don't know how to do this. There will al
So here's the situation. I created a local branch. Then I pushed that local branch to github. So github now has two branches. Now I want to merge the two branches together both locally and on github.
I have a problem with a SVN branch. I made a checkout of it with git checkout -t -b stable svn/stable. Then I did a merge with git rebase master. After that I tried to commit the merge changes into th
My commits on the Git tree are out of the master branch. The result of this is when I push to my central repository the commits that are out of the master branch don't get pushed. Here is a image of w
Here is my situation, there is a GIT repository, I am working on master while someone else is working on a branch, say subway, with the following history (say for one single file): edit:sorry the form
I did a merge from branch xyz to master involving about 20 files, and there were no conflicts. I cannot remember the options I used unfortunately, but whatever I did, the resulting code is the desired
I have master and develop branch. In develop branch I have commit1. Question: How to add changes from commit1(develop) to master branch as local changes (uncomitted changes)?
I know how to synchronize two branches (i.e. the gh-pages branch is updated everytime the master is updated). What I would like is to sinchronize only a certain directory of master to the gh-pages b
Say there are two branches master and branchA. I work on master, a friend on branchA. Once things are finalized, we merge branchA with master. After several commits on the merged master, the client
I know how to setup araxis merge to be my git diff / merge tool, so if I do git difftool it automatically launches araxis merge. However if I do git difftool upstream/master (to see all the difference
I would like to know how to delete a commit. By delete, I mean it is as if I didn't make that commit, and when I do a push in the future, my changes will not push to the remote branch. I read git he
Imagine, I have several branches: master, a, b, c ... Now I'm in master branch and git pull. This fetches all changes from remote server into origin/master, origin/a, origin/b ... branches and merge
At some branch X I did git merge master But there was some conflicts. I did a mistake during resolving the conflicts, (basically doing git add when I should have done git rm to confirm some local de
After messing up with my git branches a lot, I ended up with a stable develop branch and unstable master. I merged my stable commit of develop branch into master. But still my master is unstable. How
I am using git-flow, but that's not important. My master branch is production and my develop branch is for development. This morning, my master branch (this is my production release) hadn't been touch
I have git repository with one master branch. I decided to develop new feature and I have created new branch 'new_branch' I have created some commits in 'new_branch, but I am not finished new feature
I am using git for 1st time. I had created a branch on git, after creating branch I had not work on that branch, I did work in master. now I want that changes in my branch also so how can I pull these
I am working on a feature branch us_stable . I merged another branch Proto in this us_stable branch and after that I did some more commits and pushed to us_stable branch. Now I want to revert the bran
is it possible to show only commits a and changes created in specific branch? If I do this before merge it works. If I merge master branch to this branch (to make it actual) then I see commits and mer