Undo a Git merge?
Within my master branch, I did a
git merge some-other-branch locally, but never pushed the changes to origin master. I didn't mean to merge, so I'd like to undo it. When doing a
git status after my merge, I was getting this message:
# On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 4 commits.
Based upon some instructions I found, I tried running
git revert HEAD -m 1
but now I'm getting this message with
# On branch master
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/master' by 5 commits.
I don't want my branch to be ahead by any number of commits. How do I get back to that point?
I am trying to use p4merge with git but I am getting: Error starting p4merge: path/myFile is (or points to) an invalid file (this lists the BASE, LOCAL, REMOTE, and standard version of the file). G
I accidentally ran 'git add -A' I haven't run a commit since adding those files and I'd like to undo this command. I realize that I could manually remove files with git rm --cached <path_to_file>
I was doing some work at home over the weekend and used git to merge code changes back to my office computer (connected via a vpn) and found some very ugly merge problems. First of all the merge shoul
I am very new to git. I wonder -- is it possible in git to merge two files (from different branches) multiple times? e.g. say I have file.txt in the master branch, and another version of the same file
My branch's history is as follows : Now I want to revert merge with branch 558. I have it's sha code, so I'm doing : git revert -m 1 1784adf300f43fb76391e92f80be01132eddb680 and the result is : [mast
I have run git reset --soft HEAD^ command which has done undo my commit. But now problem I am facing is...Files and folders are still seems added means in green. Now to undo file added there is comm
I recently switched to command-line git for my personal projects. I have used 3-way merge tools in the past and found them to be still a pain. I really like the way CLI git handles merge file, it du
I am on branch mybranch1. mybranch2 is forked from mybranch1 and changes were made in mybranch2. Then, while on mybranch1, I have done git merge --no-commit mybranch2 It shows there were conflicts wh
I have an interesting problem, I can't seem to find a simple enough answer for this. I have 3 tracked branches: master, staging, production. Master is the main code that I play with and merge changes
There're few question about flattening merge on StackOverflow, with an answer usually being git rebase. These answers though miss one crucial point - order of commits. Suppose there's a branch A w
As far as I see, git pull someRemote master tries to merge the remote branch into mine. Is there a way to say Completely discard my stuff, just make me another clone of the remote using git pull? I
Using git bisect I found the culprit commit - it is a merge commit (I'm on the master branch) I'm trying to isolate the buggy code but the merge included some commits from the merged branch and I don'
I get stumped when git diff other_branch shows differences and git merge other_branch does nothing. What's the right way to incorporate that missing code into my_branch? This SO answer diagramed a s
Have a scenario where we un-intentionally merged a named branch (ABC) into our default branch. hg rollback is not an option because there have been a couple commits since. Is there a way to undo this
What is the right format for a git merge with a strategy of recursive ours? (not to be confused with the git merge ours strategy) http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-merge.html I tried
I am working on a script in which I am gradually merging the Linux kernel into a branch that took off from an older version and has slightly modified it. As a result, I have many git merge <sha>
How can I merge history of my git project so that all commits histories are considered to be parts of one branch? Currently I have this: * 465a83a Highlight search * 37a367d Tab=3; AutosaveSession (N
I'm trying to combine code on two branches with the 'git merge' command, but git is crashing during the process. I need to find an alternative way to merge these branches. To increase merge output to
Possible Duplicate: git whitespace woes How can I setup get to not report conflicts purely due to whitespace on a merge, like the following ? <<<<<<< HEAD open RESDBFILE, <
I've one question about general DVCS, including Git and Hg. In both Git and Hg merge tracking is done at the commit level instead of the file/directory level. One of the side effects is that you
Is there an option like --author of git-commit for git-merge? We maintain a staging environment where some changes must be performed. Some limitations make us to use only one linux user to access stag
Say you are in a branch topic, you have been working for a while and want to merge in some commits from master. You run git merge and there are a few conflicts. But you don't have time to resolve the
I have mainProject on git, with a shared library. This shared library is also in subProject. my workflow I start my project by cloning the project and create a branch : git clone https://github.com/us
I am using git-bash on Windows. I made a change that affects multiple files (around 500) Now, the problem is half of the changes should not happen and I need to undo all the changes made to those fil
How do I perform the equivalent of the TFS 'Undo pending changes' in Git, on one or multiple files? That basically means to do these steps: Undo changes on disk Resetting any changes Git has discover
As above, is it possible to export an SVN repo with history into a new Git repo and then use Git to do a merge from a branch back into the trunk?
I have created a new branch from an existing branch: git checkout master git checkout -b test then in the new branch I've renamed a file: git mv foo.txt fooOld.txt git mv fooNew.txt foo.txt git commi
How can I see the parents of an uncommitted merge in git? I can see one parent by doing git log -1 but how do I see the other parent? This is easy to do in Mercurial: $ hg parents changeset: 2:b65656d
As the title says, I am not really clear about the differences between a git merge --squash and a git merge --no-commit. As far as I understand the help page for git merge, both commands would leave m
We have two branches in GIT with some PHP-files. All we need to do is to merge one into another. Unfortunately, there are two huge files that was auto-reformatted with our IDEs (spaces, braces, line-b
A GIT merge introduces a new commit. This causes problems with git blame: the merged lines appear to be committed by the developer that did the merge. I can understand this being the case for confli
At some branch X I did git merge master But there was some conflicts. I did a mistake during resolving the conflicts, (basically doing git add when I should have done git rm to confirm some local de
My lead says to merge an issue into the main branch, first I should git fetch git checkout main-branch git reset --hard origin/main-branch # ??? git checkout my-branch git merge main-branch This appe
Is there a git hook I can use for merge conflicts? After a failed git merge, it would be great to be able to write a script that opens all files with conflicts in $EDITOR. Unfortunately the post-merge
After fetching from remote using git fetch, we need to use something like git merge origin/master I would like to know if this command also does git commit at the same time? Is the order origin/maste
How do I undo parts of my unstaged changes in git but keep the rest as unstaged? The way I figured out is: git commit --interactive # Choose the parts I want to delete # Commit the changes git stash g
I have two branches with the exact same file (incase you are wondering it is a .sql file) and I want to interactively merge it. Pretty much I want to open up a diff program like I do when there is a c
I have merged two of my branches (using the Eclipse merge tool). When I commit, the commit has only one of the branches as parents (the original workspace HEAD). I'll dig into why that happens later,
Sometimes git stash fails even though I can manually make a backup of the project folder with the uncommitted changes, and then call Undo Uncommitted Changes. This happens, for example, if I add a n
Okay, first of all, do I have this right?: Suppose you have local branches A and B, and they have no commits in common. When I do git checkout A git merge B Git creates a new commit on the A branch i
I'm trying to follow the now famous git flow model of development, but I'm having some difficulty understanding how to perform some operations from the command-line. If I run git merge develop from th
I'm trying to do a merge where I have conflicts and one file has diverged massively. The eclipse git merge tool is great for small changes, but one of my files is large and has hundreds of explicitly
There's a package for Emacs which lets you use an undo-tree instead of just going forward and backwards with undo: http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UndoTree Is there a similar thing for git, which would
A file couldn't be merged, how do I merge it with git?
The way you git ignore watching/tracking a particular dir/file. you just run this: git update-index --assume-unchanged <file> Now how do you undo it?
Every time I do a git fetch / git merge origin/master, I lose access to write to the files that have been changed. I've tried git config --add --global core.filemode false to no avail. Any other ideas
In my git (v 18.104.22.168), I have to do the following in my terminal: GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT=no export GIT_MERGE_AUTOEDIT So, everytime I merge, I am not force to put a message. Where should I put this, so
In a merge with conflicts, is there a way to tell git to keep one version for a set of files? $ git checkout some_branch $ git merge origin/master $ ?
What's the difference between 'git pull' and 'git fetch'? The question above's top answer says In the simplest terms, git pull does a git fetch followed by git merge or git rebase. I understand th
Our small team thought it would be a cool idea if the libraries (X, Y, Z) of our project A were separated into git submodules. Little did we realize how big of a pain this would be, especially since h