Difference between git pull . master vs git merge master
Having no remote repository, just one local repository with two branches.
$ git branch -a
Are following commands in this context the same/synonym?
$ git pull . master
$ git merge master
$ git help pull gives following information
git pull <options> <repository> <refspec>...
Note that you can use . (current directory) as the <repository> to pull
from the local repository — this is useful when merging local branches
into the current branch.
I actually don't understand why this is useful as mentioned in this manpage.
From a git branch, a colleague of mine ran git diff origin master What is it supposed supposed to do? What does origin separately point to? This is related, but not covered in In Git, what is the d
I have a remote repository (origin) and my local repository. How to make a diff between my local master and the origin master please? In the command line I simply write : git diff master origin/master
After doing git reset --hard I expected to see 'HEAD is now at hexNumber' and then 'on branch master....nothing to commit. Instead I see wb316-mac03:MoodTrack student$ git reset --hard HEAD is now
I know how to setup araxis merge to be my git diff / merge tool, so if I do git difftool it automatically launches araxis merge. However if I do git difftool upstream/master (to see all the difference
I'm tracking a svn repository using git. A merge was done on 2014-01-09 (producing commit A) and another on 2014-02-12 (producing commit B). When I git checkout master; git log, I see the commits for
For some reason, whenever I git pull to update my codebase, instead of it invoking the usual sort of pull from origin/master to master I'm prompted to specify commit history with all of the usual merg
Say I have two branches master -- A - - - - - - merge \ / \- develop -- B -- C Now if I want to merge it will be a fast forward, but should I do git checkout develop git merge master or git checkou
What is the difference between doing: mkdir repo cd repo git init git remote add origin git://github.com/cmcculloh/repo.git git fetch --all git pull origin master and git clone git://github.com/cmccu
Possible Duplicate: 'git pull origin mybranch' leaves local mybranch N commits ahead of origin. Why? I'm getting this info in git >git status # On branch master # Your branch is ahead of 'origin/
I was trying to merge a dev branch into master. git checkout master git pull . dev Everything seemed to go well, although there were conflicts I fixed these and commited. But when I checked this newl
I started using git-svn recently. My git work flow is like this. git checkout master git svn rebase git checkout -b topicbranch ..changes git commit git checkout master git merge topicbranch git svn r
Say there are 100 developers working on the same project. When each developer pushes their changeset to the central repo (origin master), are they forced to pull/merge locally to get all the updates b
I have done the following: git add <filenames> git commit git push origin master:mybranch From my origin server, I did the following: git merge mybranch All of my changes are now present on th
After fetching from remote using git fetch, we need to use something like git merge origin/master I would like to know if this command also does git commit at the same time? Is the order origin/maste
I'm using git 1.8.4 and trying to add a submodule that tracks master of another repository. I tried adding it as follows: git submodule add -b master /path/to/myrepo.git And I get the following error
I'm not sure how I got into this state, but my master branch on my local git-svn repo seems to be pointing to the remote UAT branch. git status # On branch master nothing to commit (working directory
So I've read plenty of answers on this already, saying that pull = fetch + merge. But I'm not totally convinced. This morning instead of doing a git pull to update my code with everyone's changes, I
I am not that knowledgable on the subject of git but have been attempting to learn it for a few weeks so please bare with me. So here is the problem: Whenever I do $ git pull 'https://github.com/usern
I've done merge some-branch into master, but gets confilcts. How to undo this ? git checkout master git merge some-branch ... CONFLICTS :(
I am the sole developer working on a fairly big project. I made several important changes in master and I'm about to resume working on a feature branch that has fallen behind a good deal. The feature
Suppose I was on master branch and created a new branch: git checkout -b feature_branch I started to work on feature_branch, and at some point I would like to merge my changes to master using rebase.
I have an existing folder that has many files and folders with no source control. I create a git repository in it's root folder: git init However, there is no master git branch returns nothing. H
Current Process Flow : Currently i am having four git branches Master, prod, stage and dev. The commit goes in this order, all the development commits goes to the dev branch at the end of each sprint
Okay, first of all, do I have this right?: Suppose you have local branches A and B, and they have no commits in common. When I do git checkout A git merge B Git creates a new commit on the A branch i
The question is - how to achieve correct version (shown with git describe) on develop after I merged it into master and tagged master. I use common git branching - master for production. Let's say git
My commits on the Git tree are out of the master branch. The result of this is when I push to my central repository the commits that are out of the master branch don't get pushed. Here is a image of w
When working with multiple people with git, is it better for everyone to just work in master, and merge between each other's masters, or for everyone to work in their own titled branch? As I see i
I'm working on a development branch which differs quite extensively from the master branch. I have a number of changes that I want to commit to master, but I definitely can't merge the branches. How
I think I'm on the right track to understand the basic concepts of git. I've already set up a remote repos and cloned from. On the other hand I created a server side empty repos and linked my local re
I cloned a Git master and made a lot of changes on the clone. I have since committed these changes on the clone and now want the master to be a carbon copy of what is on the clone. I've tried Git push
I have read the documentation, however I am having a hard time understanding the difference between git reset --merge And git reset --keep Please provide a simple explaination and/or example.
Suppose I have 2 branches, master and other. I go in the other branch, add 2 files, commit and push. Now I go into the master branch, add files to a different directory, and commit them. Then I merge
Say I have these git branches: master branchone I want to do this, keeping all history intact: master -> oldmaster branchone -> master
I have a branch master which has a so-called hotfix-branch, hotfix/foo, on that hotfix-branch, I have several commits, say A, B and C. I then merge that into master with: git checkout master git mer
I noticed the names master and origin being used a lot in git. What's the difference between these, and are either standard in git, or are they just common practice? Which would be the root folder
I know, origin is a term for the remote repository and master is the branch there. I am purposely omitting the context here and I am hoping that the answer should not depend upon the context. So in
I'm using MsysGit. After I do git fetch origin master, and run git diff master origin/master nothing shows up. But if I run git diff master FETCH_HEAD the differences will show up. Haven't changed any
I am a complete newbie when it comes to Git and am struggling to understand how handle merges on branches. Basically I have branchA which has some changes, master (which I'm trying to use as analog to
If a branch is not fully merged, shouldn't git diff give some output? How can the following behavior be explained: $ git branch foo * master $ git diff master..foo $ git br -d foo error: The branch 'f
This is probably one of the silliest questions i have asked. I'm trying to use Git for a project set up by someone else. I have pulled the master branch from the remote repository and I branched it
What is the difference between git and cvs version control systems? I have been happily using CVS for over 10 years and have been told that GIT is much better. Could someone please explain what the d
I am trying to push my code to my Github account using the guidelines from the Git Help. I tried both command-line and the GUI tool-GitExtension. I am able to perform the initial steps successfully bu
Using git pull used to pull from the remote repository as expected - now, it's asking me to use git pull origin master. I don't quite understand the instructions it's giving me, saying I can add somet
Basically, I was working already in the master branch , (I hadn't checked out to another branch) and after doing git add . and git commit, I accidentally ran git checkout master, now when I do git pus
Question What's the difference between: $ git remote add origin firstname.lastname@example.org:yourname/yourproject.git $ git config remote.origin.push refs/heads/master:refs/heads/master $ git push and: $ git remot
I have a project tracked in git that has a master branch that becomes the release for my code. I have some code in that branch that is causing problems because an external library that it relies on is
Is there a way on GIT to just do a git push and it automatically send to origin master without specify that? Just curious...
I want to add these lines to git config. I need a command line solution. [branch master] remote = origin merge = refs/heads/master
I am trying out GIT, and using the GIT GUI (from msysgit) with it. I am trying to make a new branch, but somehow it keeps taking over the master branch. The master branch still appears, but not as the
What is the Difference between site.master vs main.master.