Problems using git merge
I'm fairly new to git. Just a few minutes ago, I performed a merge on two branches; let's call them A and B. I was 'on' branch A; my next command was 'git merge B'. It said there was one conflict, but I looked in the file and there were no conflict markers. I added the file, committed the change, and did the merge command again. "Already up-to-date" is the message I get.
Yet no merge seems to have taken place. Both branches still exist, and both are exactly as they were before the merge.
What did I do wrong? And how can I make these two branches merge successfully?
When merging a branch into another, it is possible to define the merge strategy like git merge release -X ours This applies the strategy ours globally when merging stuff from the release branch int
Is there any difference between git merge c1 c2 and git merge c2 c1 ? Also, is there any difference between git checkout c1 git merge c2 and git checkout c2 git merge c1 ?
I am working on a branch and I want to merge another branch to mine. And I want to make sure I take all the changes from that branch to mine because that branch has all the front-end changes and none
I used to work with 3-way merge tools like BC3, SourceGear, or P4 which usually show 4 components: base, left, right, and merged result. What Git seems to do, and rightly so especially in cases of a g
To trigger a git hook after a pull i made a post-merge hook. The script looks like this: #!/bin/sh git log > gitlog.txt The file is called 'post-merge' and has the same owner as the one that runs
What do the file status mean in git merge commits? Such as MM, MA, AM? One can see them using git log --merges --name-status -c One of the commits is like: commit 6be3b2d7d24e0ca90260d422b5e7777
I try to merge branch into master: repo = pygit2.Repository(/path/to/repo/) branch = repo.lookup_branch(upstream/branch, pygit2.GIT_BRANCH_REMOTE) oid = branch.target merge_result = repo.merge(oid
I'm using git. I have done pull action. and there was a merge conflict. I want to return a specific file to version before the merge. How do i do this? After I have done this I want to pull this file
We have a git workflow which is mostly based on rebasing local topic branches, as to achieve as linear a commit tree as possible. However sometimes it is necessary to merge and we do allow that. How c
I have created a new commit, but forgot to pull before that using git stashand than git pull. Now if I will do the git pull . I'll get one more commit as merge origin/branch to my branch (already some
I started a new solution and created three sub-projects: Domain (Class Library) Web (ASP.Net MVC 4) Unit Test Project After that, I just pushed my files to GitHub repository using GIT for Visual Stu
So, I don't know if anyone's noticed but the new Merge Tool packaged with VS2012 is sick-o to the max. I've recently moved to Git for my source control and really want to be able to set up VS2012 as m
Is there any difference between git merge --no-commit and git cherry-pick --no-commit? And is there any difference in history if I commit after these two commands?
Is there any way of simulating a git merge between two branches (current working branch and the master), but without making any changes? I often have conflicts when I have to make a git merge. Is ther
I have two git branches B1 and B2. B2 has the newest copy of my file F. When I merge B2 into B1 ( git checkout B1 && git merge B2 ) the log for F ( git log F) does not contain any of the commi
Sometimes I type accidentaly the wrong branch name, when I do git pull origin BRANCH. Is there a way to forbid git pull origin XXX when XXX is not the same branch I have currently checked on my l
If I merge a git feature branch back onto master, is it best to then delete the branch? Let's say 6 months later, I want to resurrect that deleted branch (assume a freshly cloned repo). Is there a way
I have a problem with latest version of git i compiled under cygwin. At first, it displays editor to enter merge message. Previously, it went sailent. And then commit author seems to be different from
In svn I can merge from branch to trunk by specifying the revision number like this trunk>svn merge -r r1:r2 <branch> However, in git, it seems like the merge is always a reintegration merge
I'm currently trying to migrate our cvs repository to git so all old data is needed but I am running into some problems. Importing works. First make a local cvs using cvs init in CVSREPOLOCAL Copy the
I merged an upstream of a large project with my local git repo. Prior to the merge I had a small amount of history that was easy to read through, but after the merge a massive amount of history is now
I'm in branch_X I do git log -p lib/foo to see differences in the file foo, but the interesting thing I want to see is just written as: commit aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa Merge: bbbbbbbb cccccc Merge bran
I am just very confused by this conflicting thing. I do want to put webrat.log into my .gitignore so that I don't need to merge it every time. Yet I notice from Michael Hartl's Rails 3 tutorial book t
I have been developing a branch happily and each day rebasing each day from the master with: git rebase master Today when I did a rebase master, I get the following message: Falling back to patching
I have a git repository that I am using and I've screwed up. I made a few patches to the source tree and then went on to do upgrades without committing the patches first. Then I committed the whole ba
Using Git 184.108.40.206 on Linux, I have been working on two different branches based on master in parallel (call them A and B), and also created a third branch (call it M) which merges those two branches—s
I have an interesting problem, I can't seem to find a simple enough answer for this. I have 3 tracked branches: master, staging, production. Master is the main code that I play with and merge changes
Is git's merge conflict resolution inherently more efficient than other SCMs (CVS,Subversion,etc.), and also standalone merge tools? If so, why? Clarification: here I'm more interested in the algorith
I have made some changes on my forked repository, and I wish to overwrite a single file from upstream. The upstream repository is added as a remote. When I perform a merge, git tells me I am up to dat
Coming from an svn background, I had this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1138990/git-equivalent-of-svn-status-u (what is the git equivalent of svn status -u) And I understand, you do: gi
is there a best approach for resolving merge conflicts in notes branch(git-notes) of git. The usual practice of doing a git pull --rebase origin refs/notes/commits:refs/notes/commits does not work.
I need to add a file to the gitignore file. Multiple instances of the repository are present on my server. Can I do this? git git rm --cached file.php git commit -m ignore file git push origin devel
I want to merge a branch into another branch selectively & then merge another branch ignoring 1 branch in between. How do I do this with Git? I am using Git Extensions for visual studio.
Is there any chance in GIT to intercept merge process when there are no conflicts? I had a look at merge driver stuff but the only problem is that driver is triggered when there are merge conflicts on
we are using git on a lan of computers and we have a central repository on one machine, every developer has to clone the repository and work on his one machine. but how to merge all this repositories
I understand that if I have a branch ready to merge with remote master, I need to do: git checkout 'my branch' git rebase master (rebase because I want simple history + my changes are minuscule enoug
I have tried get the change of github repository to one repository bazaar, something like this: bzr merge email@example.com:Author/repository.git is there any way to do this?
A while back I asked our developers to use rebase instead of merge before pushing. Eliminating trivial merges makes for a much easier to follow commit graph (ie: gitk, git log). Sometimes folks still
Take the following case: I have some work in a topic branch and now I'm ready to merge back to master: * eb3b733 3 [master] [origin/master] | * b62cae6 2 [topic] |/ * 38abeae 1 I perform the merge fr
I do not have a core.editor set in my git config. I am not sure how to stop sublime from opening, it used to deal with merge msgs/conflicts in vi, I would like to get that functionality back. I just u
My current situation I have 2 git repositories of the same software project, where one is the fork of the other: fork: A1 - B1 - C1 - ... - HEAD_FORK : (Some changes done outside of git) : orig: A2 -
My repository have a master and dev branch. At this time I wish merge the dev with the master, or better, not a merge, but total replacement the content of the master branch with the dev. Is it possib
Is it possible to do a git merge, but without a commit? man git merge says this: With --no-commit perform the merge but pretend the merge failed and do not autocommit, to give the user a chance to
Something I still haven't gotten my head wrapped around with regards to using Git is how do I list 'what changed' as a result of a merge in Git? Ultimately, I just want a list of files that were modif
Sorry, this is a very simple question. What does this merge marker mean in GIT >>>>>>> next-release:db/schema.rb when it's got no accompanying? ======= Also, is there some way t
I am trying to use p4merge with git but I am getting: Error starting p4merge: path/myFile is (or points to) an invalid file (this lists the BASE, LOCAL, REMOTE, and standard version of the file). G
So I have a project on which me and another guy, are doing our thing. We are using 'git' for version control. Now, he has his own branch version2 and I have my branch version 1. We both have commi
How does git determine that a particular merge has a conflict and what the conflict is? My guess would go something like this: if the two commits being merged have a common parent commit, and if they
Is there an easy way to detect potential merge/rebase conflict between two branches with git command? For example some files are both modified in two branches, or some files are deleted from one branc
I'm trying to understand ... What's the difference between git merge and git rebase?